Posted by: Robert Horwitz | November 18, 2022

The Tax Court Gives a Primer on Listed Transactions while Invalidating the Conservation Easement Listed Transaction Notice by Robert S. Horwitz

The Supreme Court emphasized that it was not inclined “to carve out an approach to administrative review good for tax law only” in Mayo Found. for Med. Educ. & Rsch. v. United States, 562 U.S. 44, 55 (2011).  That the IRS is subject to the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) in the same way as other administrative agencies has become increasingly clear.  In CIC Services, LLC v. IRS, 141 S.Ct. 1582 (2021), the Court held that a material advisor can maintain an action challenging the IRS’s listed transaction notice for micro-captive insurance companies as violative of the APA.   Earlier this year, the Sixth Circuit in Mann Construction, Inc. v. United States, 24 F.4th 1138 (6th Cir. 2022), held that Notice 2007-83, designating as a listed transaction certain employee-benefit plans involving life insurance policies, was invalid because it was issued in violation of the APA’s notice-and-comment rulemaking requirements. 

Click Here for Full Article.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

%d bloggers like this: