
Philipp Behrendt was recently quoted in “Crypto Theft, Tax Losses, and Recovery,” by Lee A. Sheppard, published in Tax Notes Federal, Volume 192, on August 10, 2026. The article examines the tax consequences of cryptocurrency theft and fraud, including the challenges victims face in establishing a deductible theft loss, demonstrating a profit motive, and proving that there is no reasonable prospect of recovery. It also discusses the practical difficulties of tracing and recovering stolen digital assets and the consumer-protection implications of proposed crypto legislation.
Discussing the importance of developing the evidentiary record necessary to support a theft-loss claim, Behrendt explained:
“The central difficulty for victims is that the tax system does not simply ask whether the taxpayer was harmed. It asks whether the harm fits a statutory category. The administrative file should be built as if the case will be litigated: chronology, transfer trail, communications, platform screenshots, withdrawal-denial messages, law-enforcement reports, exchange records, wallet addresses, and a short legal analysis of the applicable theft statute.”
The article also addresses the requirement that a taxpayer establishes that there is no reasonable prospect of recovery. On the significance and limitations of blockchain tracing, Behrendt cautioned:
“On one hand, blockchain tracing may show where the funds went and sometimes support law enforcement action. On the other hand, the mere theoretical possibility of tracing does not necessarily create a reasonable prospect of recovery.”
Finally, Behrendt emphasized that victims should act promptly both to maximize potential recovery and to preserve the record supporting the tax treatment of the loss:
“The recovery effort is a crucial stage, but as a practical matter it is very difficult. Victims should move quickly to preserve records, file an IC3 [FBI Internet Crime Complaint Center] complaint, report to banks and exchanges, and, where appropriate, obtain blockchain tracing.”
The article further notes Behrendt’s observations regarding the challenges of matching seized cryptocurrency to individual victims and obtaining restitution when stolen assets have moved through commingled accounts and laundering networks.
Click Here for Link to the Article (Subscription Required)
Philipp Behrendt is a Principal at Hochman Salkin Toscher Perez P.C., licensed in California as well as in Germany and assists in advising clients in civil and criminal tax controversies as well as international money laundering investigations stemming from tax avoidance structures. He also focuses on the technical aspects involved in advising voluntary disclosures in connection with DeFis, NFTs, and other crypto assets. Philipp is a Liaison to the Young Lawyer Committee for the ABA Tax Section’s Civil and Criminal Tax Penalties Committee and served on the Beverly Hills Bar Association’s Barristers Board of Governors from 2022 to 2023. Philipp is the Chair of the Beverly Hills Bar Association’s Tax Section and the Blockchain and Web3 Law Section.
For more information, please contact Philipp Behrendt at behrendt@taxlitigator.com.

















